My first introduction to reels was not Instagram.
It was not cinema theory.
It was not anthropology.
It was not some TED Talk on the attention economy.
It was a cassette.
And most probably, the song was either “College Ki Ladki” or “Jumma Chumma De De.”
There was a time when listening to a favourite song required commitment. You did not just tap, search, or ask Alexa. You had to own a cassette. You had to know which side the song was on. Side A or Side B. You had to press play and wait.

And if the cassette had gone ahead, you had to rewind.
If the cassette player became moody — which it often did — the tape would come out like noodles. Then came the great Indian repair technique: insert pencil into cassette reel and rotate with full engineering confidence.
That was my first reel.
A tiny plastic wheel holding brown magnetic tape, my patience, and Amitabh Bachchan’s baritone promise of “Jumma Chumma.”
Today, when I see people making reels, I realise the word has travelled from my cassette player to my phone screen.
From spooling to scrolling.
From pencil rewinding to thumb swiping.
From waiting for one song to play to skipping fifty videos in one minute.
The first reel: a spool with emotion
The original reel was a simple rotating object. Thread, wire, film, tape — all of it could be wound on a reel.
But for my generation, the reel was not just a mechanical part.
It was emotion management.
If the song was somewhere in the middle of the cassette, you had to develop instinct. Press rewind. Stop. Play. Wrong song. Rewind again. Play. Still wrong. Fast forward. Play. Too far.
There was no progress bar.
There was no waveform.
There was no “skip intro.”
There was only judgment.
And sometimes, when the song finally started, there was a strange joy. You had earned it.
Today’s reels give instant entertainment.
Those reels gave delayed satisfaction.
Maybe that is why we still remember them.
Cassette reels: the original algorithm
Before Instagram’s algorithm, there was another mysterious system controlling our lives: the cassette sequence.
You wanted one song. The cassette gave you another.
You wanted “College Ki Ladki.” The cassette said, first listen to two average songs, one sad Kumar Sanu song, and half an instrumental.
The cassette had its own recommendations engine.
But unlike today’s algorithm, it was not trying to trap your attention forever. It was simply a victim of linear technology.
Still, we adjusted. We memorised where songs were placed. We knew roughly how many seconds to rewind. We knew when the machine sound changed slightly before the song began.
That was not user experience.
That was relationship experience.
You did not use a cassette player.
You developed a relationship with it.
Film reel: when the spool became storytelling
Then there was the other reel — the film reel.
Cinema itself lived on reels. Entire worlds were wound around circular spools. Heroes, villains, mothers, lost brothers, angry fathers, college romances, item songs, and dramatic courtroom speeches were all packed into reels.
In old cinema, a movie did not exist in the cloud. It existed physically — in cans, in projection rooms, in reels that had to be loaded and played.
The audience saw the magic.
The projectionist handled the mechanics.
In a way, every reel has always had this dual nature.
For the audience, it is entertainment.
For the creator, it is technique.
Today’s influencer may look casual while saying, “Guys, a lot of you have been asking me…” But behind that casualness is lighting, framing, editing, captions, hook, music, and timing.
The projection room has moved into the phone.
Showreel: the birth of personal branding
Before Instagram Reels, there were showreels.
Actors had showreels. Directors had showreels. Models had portfolios. Musicians had demo tapes.
A showreel was proof of work.
It said:
“Here is what I can do. Please hire me.”
This is where the reel became professional currency.
Talent became clips.
Experience became highlights.
Identity became edited footage.
And today, that showreel logic has reached everyone.
The travel influencer says: “I travel beautifully.”
The finance influencer says: “I understand money better than your relatives.”
The fitness influencer says: “Pain is temporary, but content is permanent.”
The running influencer says: “Your cadence, shoes, breathing, posture, gels, sleep, and entire training philosophy are wrong.”
Everyone is auditioning.
Only now the casting director is the algorithm.
The algorithm: our new village elder

Anthropology studies human tribes, rituals, power structures, symbols, and belief systems.
So if we are doing an anthropology of reels, we must ask: who has power in this tribe?
The answer is clear.
The algorithm.
Earlier, in the cassette era, if you wanted “Jumma Chumma,” you controlled the pencil.
Today, the platform controls the pencil.
It rewinds you.
It fast-forwards you.
It decides what song, dance, joke, opinion, outrage, recipe, investment advice, and motivational quote you will hear next.
In every village, there was once an elder who decided whose story mattered. In every newspaper, there was an editor. In every TV channel, there was a programming head.
In the world of reels, the algorithm is the village elder, editor, matchmaker, gossip aunty, and traffic police combined.
A creator may spend four hours shooting a reel, two hours editing it, thirty minutes choosing music, and fifteen minutes writing the caption.
The algorithm looks at it and says:
“Beta, 237 views.”
Meanwhile, someone’s dog looks suspiciously at a pressure cooker and gets 2.8 million views.
This is not technology.
This is mythology.
The reel as modern ritual
Reels are not just content. They are rituals.
People wake up and scroll.
People eat and scroll.
People stand in lifts and scroll.
People pretend to listen in meetings and scroll.
People go to the toilet and scroll with the seriousness of a research scholar.
The thumb has become a ritual object.
Swipe.
Swipe.
Swipe.
Like prayer beads for the attention economy.
Earlier, we gathered around radios. Then televisions. Then cassette players. Then desktop screens. Then mobile phones.
Now we gather alone.
Millions may watch the same reel, laugh at the same joke, copy the same dance, use the same trending audio — but mostly alone, on separate screens, in separate rooms.
The tribe exists.
But the campfire has become personal.
Influencer as performer-priest
Every age has its performer.
The village had the storyteller.
The court had the poet.
Cinema had the superstar.
Television had the anchor.
Instagram has the influencer.
The influencer is not just a person making content. The influencer is a cultural role.
They tell us what to eat, where to travel, what shoes to buy, how to invest, how to parent, how to sleep, how to wake up, how to breathe, how to age, and how to look like we are not ageing.
Earlier, wisdom came from elders.
Now it comes with subtitles, background music, and ring light reflection in the eyes.
A man in a black T-shirt says, “You are drinking water wrong,” and suddenly humanity questions 5,000 years of hydration history.
A woman in athleisure says, “Three habits that changed my life,” and thousands save the reel, never to open it again.
Saving reels is the modern version of buying self-help books and not reading them.
From memory to performance
The old reel preserved memory.
The new reel performs identity.
That is the big shift.
The cassette reel held songs.
The film reel held stories.
The showreel held talent.
The social media reel says:
“This is who I am — or at least who I want the world to think I am for the next 19 seconds.”
We are no longer just documenting life. We are staging it.
Coffee is not coffee until it has foam art and morning light.
Running is not running until Garmin data meets slow-motion sweat.
Reading is not reading until the book is beside a candle.
A vacation is not a vacation until someone walks away from the camera toward a mountain.
Even sadness has production value now.
Heartbreak comes with lo-fi music.
Burnout comes with a beige aesthetic.
Healing comes with captions.
In our time, if a cassette tape got tangled, we used a pencil.
Today, when our attention gets tangled, we use another reel.
The economics of repeated attention
The old reel was played when someone chose to play it.
The new reel plays because the platform keeps pushing it.
Over and over.
Again and again.
A good reel is not simply watched. It is replayed, shared, remixed, copied, reacted to, and converted into ten other reels.
This is where the word “reel” becomes almost perfect.
A reel is circular. It loops. It returns to the beginning. It does not end in the old sense.
The modern reel is built for repetition.
The song hook repeats.
The dance repeats.
The advice repeats.
The outrage repeats.
The same joke appears in five languages, seven accents, and twelve creator formats.
We are not consuming content in a straight line anymore. We are caught in loops.
That is why reels feel addictive. They are not chapters. They are snacks. They do not ask for commitment. They ask for one more second.
And then one more.
And then suddenly it is 12:47 AM and you are watching a man in Canada explaining how to fold fitted bedsheets.
The great democratisation — and the great confusion
To be fair, reels have done something remarkable.
They have democratised creativity.
You no longer need a studio, camera crew, editor, producer, or distribution network. A teenager in a small town can create a reel and reach millions. A home chef can build a food brand. A running coach can find students. A small business can demonstrate a product. A comedian can become famous without begging television channels.
This is powerful.
The gatekeepers have weakened.
But the gates have not disappeared. They have just become invisible.
Earlier, the gatekeeper had a name: editor, producer, channel head.
Now the gatekeeper is hidden inside engagement metrics.
Watch time. Completion rate. Saves. Shares. Comments. Retention curve.
Creativity has become measurable, but not always meaningful.
And this is the confusion of our time:
Something can be very popular and still be very empty.
Something can be deeply meaningful and still get 312 views.
The reel rewards clarity, speed, emotion, and repeatability. It does not always reward depth.
Depth takes time.
The reel says: “Time is exactly what people don’t have.”
The anthropology of us
So the story of reels is not really the story of technology.
It is the story of us.
We have always wanted to preserve, perform, share, impress, teach, entertain, and belong.
The reel simply changed the speed.
Earlier, we wound thread.
Then we wound film.
Then we wound cassette tape.
Then we wound memories.
Now we wind attention.
The old reel organised material.
The new reel organises desire.
Desire to be seen.
Desire to be liked.
Desire to be remembered.
Desire to be relevant.
Desire to convert life into something postable.
Somewhere, the reel has become both mirror and marketplace.
It shows us what we want to be.
It also sells us the tools to become that person.
The end that loops back
The irony is beautiful.
A reel began as something that prevented tangling.
Today, reels may be the thing tangling our minds.
The old reel stored content patiently.
The new reel demands attention urgently.
The old reel waited inside a cassette.
The new reel chases us in bed, in cabs, in meetings, in airports, in queues, in lonely evenings.
But perhaps that is too harsh.
Because every reel is still a human attempt to say:
“Look at this.”
“Listen to me.”
“Laugh with me.”
“Learn this.”
“Remember me.”
From the spool to the screen, the reel has always carried something fragile.
Thread.
Film.
Songs.
Memory.
Identity.
Attention.
My generation learnt reels by rotating a pencil inside a cassette, hoping to reach “College Ki Ladki” or “Jumma Chumma De De.”
This generation learns reels by rotating a thumb on glass, hoping to reach the next laugh, next hook, next dopamine hit, next micro-story.
The technology has changed.
The human need has not.
We are still winding our stories around whatever tools the age gives us.
Only now, the spool fits in our palm.
And it never stops spinning. So
Nostalgic and futuristic ! Captured the changing trend across our lifetimes very well Bhaskar !
For those amongst us, who grew up reading books, the thin books and big fat once and sometimes very fat once in one to two stretch of 12 hours, and now that am only scrolling, your writing style takes me back to those times …. its gripping, has a style and is longer than our average read. But loving getting back to reading. Looking forward to the next one.